🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."